Realny priklad ze zivota je soud Kelly v. Arriba Soft v USA, kde se fotograf soudi s vyhledavacem, ktery neopravnene zobrazoval v plne velikosti fotografie, cimz fotografa poskodil a pripravil o zisk. O to jde, ne o nejake hloupe smlouvy s routery, to jiste uznate ...
no to jste tomu nasadil korunu:-)))
on Kelly ten soud prohral!
Doslovne vyjadreni:
On apparent first impression, the Court holds the use by an Internet "visual search engine" of others' copyrighted images is a prima facia copyright violation, but it may be justified under the "fair use" doctrine. The Court finds that, under the particular circumstances of this case, the "fair use" doctrine applies, and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act is not violated.